Last time I changed my desktop computer I bought a CPU from the Intel Haswell family, the one available on the market at that time. I carefully selected the CPU to make sure it supports as many instructions extensions as possible in this family (Intel likes segmentation, even high-end CPUs like the Core i7-4770k do not support all possible instructions). I ended-up choosing the Core i7-4771 as it supports the Transactional Synchronization Extensions (Intel TSX) instructions, which provide transactional memory support. Support for it has been recently added in the GNU libc, and has been activated in Debian. By choosing this CPU, I wanted to be sure that I can debug this support in case of bug report, like for example in bug#751147. Recently some computing websites started to mention that the TSX instructions have bugs on Xeon E3 v3 family (and likely on Core i7-4771 as they share the same silicon and stepping), quoting this Intel document. Indeed one can read on page 49:

HSW136. Software Using Intel TSX May Result in Unpredictable System Behavior

Problem: Under a complex set of internal timing conditions and system events, software using the Intel TSX (Transactional Synchronization Extensions) instructions may result in unpredictable system behavior.
Implication: This erratum may result in unpredictable system behavior.
Workaround: It is possible for the BIOS to contain a workaround for this erratum.

And later on page 51:

Due to Erratum HSw136, TSX instructions are disabled and are only supported for software development. See your Intel representative for details.

The same websites tell that Intel is going to disable the TSX instructions via a microcode update. I hope it won t be the case and that they are going to be able to find a microcode fix. Otherwise it would mean I will have to upgrade my desktop computer earlier than expected. It s a bit expensive to upgrade it every year and that s a the reason why I skipped the Ivy Bridge generation which didn t bring a lot from the instructions point of view. Alternatively I can also skip microcode and BIOS updates, in the hope I won t need another fix from them at some point.

Five years ago Debian and most derivatives switched from the standard GNU C Library (GLIBC) to the Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC). Debian is now about to take the reverse way switching back to GLIBC, as EGLIBC is now a dead project, the last release being the 2.19 one. At the time of writing the glibc package has been uploaded to experimental and sits in the NEW queue. EGLIBC is dead for a good reason: the GLIBC development has changed a lot in the recent years, due to two major events: Ulrich Drepper leaving Red Hat and the GLIBC development, and the GLIBC steering committe self-dissolving. This has resulted in a much more friendly development based on team work with good cooperation. The development is now based on peer review, which results in less buggy code (humans do make mistakes). It has also resulted in things that were clearly impossible before, like using the same repository for all architectures, and even getting rid of the ports/ directory. Before we used to have two sets of architectures, the main ones in the glibc repository with architectures like x86, SuperH or SPARC, and the secondary ones in the glibc-ports repository with architectures like ARM or MIPS. As you can see the separation was quite arbitrary, and often leaded to missing changes on the secondary architectures. We also got real stable branches, with regular fixes. The most important EGLIBC features have been merged to GLIBC, including for example the use of non-bash but POSIX shell, or the renaming of reserved keywords. The notable exception is the support for configurable components, which we originally planned to use for Debian-Installer, by building a smaller flavor using -Os and without NIS and RPC support. At the end we never worked on that, and it seems that the hardware targeted by Debian has grown faster than the GLIBC size, so that is not really a big loss. At the end, we ended up with only 5 missing patches from the EGLIBC tree:

• Installation of *_pic.a files for use of mklibs in debian-installer
• Dynamic reload of /etc/resolv.conf
• Installation of headers during bootstrapping
• Workarounds for PowerPC 8xx CPUs
• Access to FPSCR on SH4

The package names are unchanged (except the source package and the binary package containing the sources) so the transition is fully transparent for the users. I would like to thank all the CodeSourcery employees who worked on EGLIBC, with a special thank to Joseph Myers who spent countless hours to merge the most important EGLIBC changes back to GLIBC, and sent regular emails about the merge status. I would also like to thanks all the people on the GLIBC side that made the change to happen, and all persons participating in the GLIBC development.

I will never understand the point of using autotools, cmake or whatever configure system, when later the code uses an hardcoded list of architectures to determine the size of a pointer Unfortunately for porters this pattern is quite common. Update: As people keep asking, the way to check for the size of a given type is explained in the autoconf manual. To check for the size of the pointer, the following entry has to be added to configure.ac: AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(void *) On a 64-bit system, this will lead to the following entry in config.h:

/* The size of void *', as computed by sizeof. */
#define SIZEOF_VOID_P 8


Following the release of Debian Wheezy, I have (finally) updated my set of Debian QEMU images for both Squeeze (6.0.8) and Wheezy (7.3). The following images are now available:

• amd64 (Squeeze and Wheezy)
• armel (Squeeze and Wheezy)
• armhf (Wheezy)
• i386 (Squeeze and Wheezy)
• mips (Squeeze and Wheezy)
• mipsel (Squeeze and Wheezy)
• powerpc (Squeeze and Wheezy)

Each of these directories contains a GPG signed README.txt file with the md5sums all files, detailed instructions how to run these images and especially the minimum QEMU version to use. The requirements to run the default desktop environment have increased a lot between Squeeze and Wheezy. An accelerated graphics card is now needed to be able to use Gnome (unless you use the fallback mode), which is not something provided by QEMU (actually there is now a QXL para-virtualized video card, but the driver is only in unstable). In addition GDM now needs more than 128MiB to start, while this is the default amount of memory provided for virtual machines. I have therefore decided to switch the default desktop environment on the Wheezy images to Xfce and the display manager to LightDM. Both Gnome and GDM are still installed on the images, and the original default can easily be restored using the following commands:

• update-alternatives --auto x-session-manager
• echo /usr/sbin/gdm3 > /etc/X11/default-display-manager

Beside this the new images only contain minor changes. The filesystems have been tweaked to not run fsck after a certain amount of days, and locales-all and openssh-server are now installed in all images. For MIPS and MIPSEL, 64-bit kernels are now also installed and provided, so that it is possible to choose between a 32-bit or a 64-bit kernel (see the README.txt for more details). There is no Debian Wheezy SPARC image available, as QEMU does not fully support SPARC64 yet (it is actually possible to run it, but then the VM crashes often), and Debian Wheezy now only supports 64-bit kernels. I will also invest time to build an S390X image, but so far I haven t been successful on that. The following images are still available at the same location, though they haven t been updated:

• sparc (Etch)
• SH4 (Sid from a few years ago)

Sometimes building the same code on multiple architectures is useful to detect horrors like:

ExEnv::err0() < < sprintf("AtomInfo: invalid name: %s\n",name.c_str());
This code builds using -Werror=format-security with only a few warnings on most architectures, while GCC is correctly detects the issue on some others. This has been reported as bug#728249.


# dpkg --add-architecture kfreebsd-amd64
# dpkg -i libc0.1-dev_2.13-32_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Selecting previously unselected package libc0.1-dev.
(Reading database ... 446113 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libc0.1-dev (from libc0.1-dev_2.13-32_kfreebsd-amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing libc0.1-dev_2.13-32_kfreebsd-amd64.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite '/usr/include/_G_config.h', which is also in package libc6-dev 2.13-32
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
libc0.1-dev_2.13-32_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Before multiarch the bug was not existing, and of course none of libc6-dev and libc0.1-dev are marked as Multi-Arch: something. People wanting to delay the release of Wheezy, I am sure you can find much more RC bugs like that.

Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:22:10 +0000
From: James Troup <troup@samosa.debian.org>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: da-manager@debian.org
Subject: New Debian maintainer Aurelien Jarno [ This is a long (automatically-generated) mail, but it contains
important information, please read it all carefully. ] Dear Aurelien Jarno! An account has been created for you on developer-accessible machines with username aurel32 . The password for this account can be found encrypted with your PGP or GPG key and appended to this message. A list of machines available to Debian developers can be found at <URL:http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi>. Please take a minute now to familiarize yourself with the Debian Machine Usage Policy, available at <URL:http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup> You have been subscribed to the debian-private mailing list as <aurel32@debian.org>. Please respect the privacy of that list and don t forward mail from it elsewhere. E-mail to <aurel32@debian.org> will be forwarded to <aurelien@aurel32.net>. To change this, please see <URL:http://db.debian.org/forward.html> Also, please subscribe to debian-devel-announce, if you haven t done so already. We strongly suggest that you use your aurel32@debian.org address for the maintainer field in your packages, because that one will be valid as long as you are a Debian developer, even if you change jobs, leave university or change Internet Service providers. If you do so, please add that address to your PGP/GPG key(s) (using gpg edit-key YOUR USER ID ) and send it to the keyring server at keyring.debian.org with gpg keyserver keyring.debian.org send-keys YOUR USER ID . You can find more information useful to developers at <URL:http://www.debian.org/devel/> (in particular, see the subsection titled Debian Developer s reference ). We suggest that you subscribe to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org. This list is for new maintainers who seek help with initial packaging and other developer-related issues. Those who prefer one-on-one help can also post to the list, and an experienced developer may volunteer to help you. You can get online help on IRC, too, if you join the channel #debian-devel on irc.debian.org. Take a look at the support section on www.debian.org in order to find out more information. You should have read these documents before working on your packages. o The Debian Social Contract
<URL:http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html> o The Debian Policy Manual
<URL:http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/> If you have some spare time and want to contribute it to Debian you may wish to take a look at the Work-Needing and Prospective Packages for Debian GNU/Linux also known as WNPP that can be found at <URL:http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/> If you plan to make a Debian package from a not yet packaged piece of software you *must* announce your intention on the debian-devel mailing list to make sure nobody else is working on them. The machine ftp-master.debian.org is our main archive server. Every uploaded package finds it s way there (except for Packages covered by US crypto laws which go to non-us.debian.org) eventually. master.debian.org is the home of our bug tracking system. Project web pages and CVS archives are hosted on klecker.debian.org (aka cvs/www.debian.org), klecker is also our general shell server. Web pages should be placed in public_html on klecker and refered to by http://people.debian.org/~aurel32 You should use ssh to log into the machines instead of regular telnet or rlogin. Our LDAP directory is able to share ssh RSA keys among machines, please see <URL:http://db.debian.org/doc-mail.html> Otherwise when you first login a ~/.ssh directory will be created with the appropriate permissions. Please be aware of the security implications of using RSA authentication and ssh agents. Finally, please take a minute to visit <URL:http://db.debian.org/>.
Login using the password information appended to this email, and update your personal information. The information is used to maintain your accounts on various Debian machines, and also to allow other developers and general users to find out more about you. Many of the fields are only visible to other registered Debian developers. This is also the only way to change your password. The passwd program does not yet work. Welcome to the project!
The Debian New Maintainer Team

Sometimes life throws little curves at you to see if you are still awake, today has been one of those days. fglrx is (apparently) fixed I ve had a long-running problem with fglrx on my laptop. The problem stems from ATI closed-source drivers with one of those laptops that has an ATI and Intel driver. It means I am basically using the slow Intel chip only. This morning I had enough and backed up my home and started to rebuild the laptop with debian 6.0.3. So I kicked off the very very slow process of reformatting the crypto drive (it has taken 5 hours and still going) let it gurgle on its merry way and started to read my email. One of the emails was that my bug about fglrx not working is closed, apparently it is fixed. If I had read that 10 minutes earlier, a simple apt-get install fglrx-driver would of perhaps fixed it; oh well. My problem is now is do I move to the latest driver and hope their fix is my fix or leave it with some ancient version? My preference is the former; I only hope it works! psmisc 22.15 and buffer overflows psmisc has a program called pstree which prints the set of processes in a tree fashion. It hasn t changed much for quite a while. I released version 22.15 and the Debian package 22.15-1. 22.15-1 I also adopted the harden CFLAGS as suggested for procps. I was a little surprised that I received an important bug. The report was saying I had a buffer overflow introduced in 22.15-1, but no relevant code had changed. The compiler options had done their job and stopped a buffer being overflowed. But where exactly was the overflow? Running gdb on pstree quickly showed that it was line 267 of pstree.c which uses strcpy(). That function set off warning bells. The relevant code is: Now comm is the short command name you find in /proc//stat. It is fixed in the kernel at 16 characters. The PROC structure has this field as 17 characters long, one extra for the NUL. I went and checked the Linux source and yes, it is still 16 characters long. The clue was in the name of the program that it died on.

#6  new_proc (comm=0x6111b0 " console-kit-dae ", pid=1571, uid=0)
  at pstree.c:267

That string is 17 characters long. The problem is that 16 characters is for the name only. If the name is in brackets or braces, then that 16 character limit doesn t apply. The buffer overflow bug has been there for a long time, but only with the compiler flags did it become visible. Given you need to read names out of the /proc filesystem and if someone can fiddle with that you have bigger problems it doesn t seem to be too much of an issue. It should be (and is in Debian 22.15-2) fixed but is a nice example of the compiler catching bad things.

Related articles

• Detecting security problems using static analysis to catch them early and less expensively (blogs.windriver.com)
• A Textbook Buffer Overflow: A Look at the FreeBSD telnetd Code (thexploit.com)
• Exploit the buffer Buffer Overflow Attack (alitarhini.wordpress.com)
• Aurelien Jarno: Performances of open-source Radeon driver (aurel32.net)

I am the happy owner of a new netbook with an AMD Fusion E-450 APU, which includes a Radeon graphics card. I am using the open-source driver on it, that is a 3.2-rc7 kernel for KMS, and xserver-xorg-video-radeon package from sid. I have to say I am not really happy about the performances. No I don t speak about the graphical performances that are pretty good (especially compared to my Intel Atom N450 based previous netbook) but about the power consumption. With this setup and with the original battery I get 2h30 of autonomy. Switching to UMS and adding some power management options in xorg.conf improves it to 2h40, but breaks suspend to ram/disk (a pity for a netbook) and switch between VT. I then tried the non-free fglrx driver, it also suffers from the suspend to ram/disk issue, in addition to crashing xorg when playing videos On the other hand I get an impressive 3h30 of autonomy, and additionally a silent netbook (contrary to the open-source driver, the fan doesn t spin at idle). I have tried plenty of options, ranging from adding some power management options to xorg.conf, to passing dynclks=1 to the radeon module, including setting /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_method to dynpm. Right now I have worked around the issue by buying a bigger battery which brings me 5h30 of autonomy, but I would really appreciate any software way to improve it with the open-source driver.

I am the happy owner of a new netbook with an AMD Fusion E-450 APU, which includes a Radeon graphics card. I am using the open-source driver on it, that is a 3.2-rc7 kernel for KMS, and xserver-xorg-video-radeon package from sid. I have to say I am not really happy about the performances. No I don t speak about the graphical performances that are pretty good (especially compared to my Intel Atom N450 based previous netbook) but about the power consumption. With this setup and with the original battery I get 2h30 of autonomy. Switching to UMS and adding some power management options in xorg.conf improves it to 2h40, but breaks suspend to ram/disk (a pity for a netbook) and switch between VT. I then tried the non-free fglrx driver, it also suffers from the suspend to ram/disk issue, in addition to crashing xorg when playing videos On the other hand I get an impressive 3h30 of autonomy, and additionally a silent netbook (contrary to the open-source driver, the fan doesn t spin at idle). I have tried plenty of options, ranging from adding some power management options to xorg.conf, to passing dynclks=1 to the radeon module, including setting /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_method to dynpm. Right now I have worked around the issue by buying a bigger battery which brings me 5h30 of autonomy, but I would really appreciate any software way to improve it with the open-source driver.

I am the happy owner of a new netbook with an AMD Fusion E-450 APU, which includes a Radeon graphics card. I am using the open-source driver on it, that is a 3.2-rc7 kernel for KMS, and xserver-xorg-video-radeon package from sid. I have to say I am not really happy about the performances. No I don t speak about the graphical performances that are pretty good (especially compared to my Intel Atom N450 based previous netbook) but about the power consumption. With this setup and with the original battery I get 2h30 of autonomy. Switching to UMS and adding some power management options in xorg.conf improves it to 2h40, but breaks suspend to ram/disk (a pity for a netbook) and switch between VT. I then tried the non-free fglrx driver, it also suffers from the suspend to ram/disk issue, in addition to crashing xorg when playing videos On the other hand I get an impressive 3h30 of autonomy, and additionally a silent netbook (contrary to the open-source driver, the fan doesn t spin at idle). I have tried plenty of options, ranging from adding some power management options to xorg.conf, to passing dynclks=1 to the radeon module, including setting /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_method to dynpm. Right now I have worked around the issue by buying a bigger battery which brings me 5h30 of autonomy, but I would really appreciate any software way to improve it with the open-source driver.

During Debconf 11, I got access to a fast s390 machine, and I have started to work on a Debian s390x port, the 64-bit version of the s390 port. One of my goal was to help the SPARC64 port, as some of the issues are the same: both are 64-bit big-endian, don t support unaligned access and behave differently between -fpic and -fPIC. Why such a port? When talking about 64-bit ports, we usually hear: 4GB is enough, handling 64-bit takes more memory . This really sounds like 640K ought to be enough for anybody . The s390 port is actually 31-bit from the address point of view (one bit is reserved for address space extension from 24 to 31 bits), so each process is limited to 2GB only. Nowadays applications which need more than 2GB are not that uncommon, especially on mainframes. Actually the 2GB limit already causes some problem in Debian: in some cases it s not possible to build haskell applications or even C applications using GCC. On the other hand, we already require a 64-bit kernel on the s390 port (only the userland is 32-bit), and applications are handling more and more 64-bit or greater values (files offset, time counters, uid, etc.). What is the status? Bootstrapping the architecture was not really easy (as for any other new architectures), due to a huge amount of dependencies and build-dependencies loops, as explained by Wookey during Debconf11. Now that this part is mostly done, an autobuilder has been started and currently more than 65% of the packages are built. The s390x port is hosted on debian-ports.org. Unfortunately it is not yet deboostrapable, though that should happen in the next few days (only a few packages are missing). The main issues are currently packages which fail to build from source due to linker, gcc-4.6 and curl changes, or due to the libjpeg and multiarch transitions, and thus are not directly related to s390x. If your package is in this case, it would be a good idea to fix it. Otherwise if it has a lot of reverse dependencies and the bug is opened for a while, just expect an NMU (as allowed by the 0-day NMU policy). Of course for a few packages s390x specific fixes are needed, some of them are already in the BTS. How you can help? The list of bugs blocking the s390x port is available through the s390x usertag, fixing these bugs (a lot of them are general FTBFS) would help a lot. Alternatively if you have access to an s390x machine you can take a look at the packages failing to build. Update: Fixed the explanation about the 32th bit, thanks to Bastian Blank for the comment.

Thanks to the versatility of the Linux kernel, Debian has always been known for supporting a large number of architectures. It has also often been criticized for that as it is said to slow down the development of Debian. Among these architectures, the ARM one was considered dead a few years ago, and some people wanted to get rid of it. Today all major distributions now have an ARM port, one of those distributions being even based on Debian. It seems Debian was right. Now that Android has been ported to MIPS, we may see more and more MIPS based devices. Will the same scenario happen again?

A few months ago the netbase package started to install the /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf file to switch the default bindv6only value from 0 to 1. A lot of people are not happy with this change, but it is not my goal to give my opinion here. On the other hand, people have propagated the rumour that it has been done as the FreeBSD kernel, used in the kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 ports of Debian, only supports the mode corresponding to 1. Let s give the truth:

• GNU/kFreeBSD people haven t been contacted about this decision;
• The FreeBSD kernel can support both modes through the net.inet6.ip6.v6only sysctl. However contrary to the Linux kernel it defaults to 1;
• This option is available in the FreeBSD kernel since 2001, and in the Linux kernel since 2003.

This has been roughly one year since Debian switched from GLIBC to EGLIBC, so it s probably the time to make a small report about this change. First of all, on the GLIBC upstream side, things has improved a bit since we now have regular stable release, thanks to Petr Baudis aka Pasky. The good point is that the stable releases are imported into the EGLIBC stable repositories. On the EGLIBC side the switch has helped to reduce the number of patches in the Debian package (for example, resolv.conf is automatically reloaded if needed), and has brought some bug fixes and improvements, especially for the arm, mips and powerpc targets. It should be noted that the newly created PowerPCSPE port for PowerPC e500 series CPU also benefits from EGLIBC, as it is not natively supported by GLIBC.

Thanks to the great work of Nobuhiro Iwamatsu and others, Debian has an unofficial SH4 port which is close to complete (> 90% of the packages built). In order to help developers to fix bugs on this architecture, I have produced an SH4 QEMU image which is available at the same location as my other QEMU images. You will need a recent GIT HEAD QEMU to use it. Previous versions suffer from bugs in the MMU, causing segfaults and gratuitous TLB flushing. The MMU emulation is now hopefully correct, but still a bit slow. Also the emulated board is limited to 64 MB of memory, and this value can t be changed as memory extension would overlap the addresses used for peripherals. Update: I have backported the necessary SH4 patches into the QEMU Debian package version 0.12.3+dfsg-4.

Contrary to what lucas announced (I don t know where he got this info), we plan to release Squeeze with eglibc 2.11. It is already packaged in experimental and is ready on all architectures except hppa where there are a few major regressions in the testsuite to fix. This is what prevent us to upload it to unstable.

In the last weeks, I stopped being motivated to work on the eglibc package, it s not fun as it was before. Maintaining this package is taking a lot of my (free) time, and I am not anymore able to follow the bug rate, especially for RC bugs or bugs that I consider high priority. In turn it does not give me time to integrate eglibc 2.11 or other wishlist features I would have liked to see (rework of the locales* packages, using multiarch paths, etc.). I hope it s only a bad moment and that things will change soon, so I can find time to work on GNU/kFreeBSD, QEMU or to do electronics. In any case you can help by handling bug reports or writing patches. Everything is in the BTS!

Last year, after many years of peacefully living the whole year in GMT-3, our government decided that Argentina should use DST again. This was done in a rush, but patches were written and applied everywhere to have a correct timezone. Fixing the problem was not enough, tzdata's upstream decided to predict the future:

# From Paul Eggert (2007-12-22):
# For dates after mid-2008, the following rules are my guesses and
# are quite possibly wrong, but are more likely than no DST at all.
Rule    Arg 2007    only    -   Dec 30  0:00    1:00    S
Rule    Arg 2008    max -   Mar Sun>=15 0:00    0   -
Rule    Arg 2008    max -   Oct Sun>=1  0:00    1:00    S

Well, back in December 2007, October 2008 might have seemed like a long time in the future, and they assumed that sometime in the middle the correct date would be announced... But, predictably (knowing Argentina's current government), no DST has yet been announced. However, Paul Eggert's guesses had propagated to almost all UNIX distributions, so that at 0:00 Sunday Oct 5th, all our computers were suddenly one hour ahead of time. Affected systems: Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Red Hat, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Mac OS. Devices: ipod, maemo, Nokia N95. Websites: Clarin (a major newspaper - still broken 36 hours later), Gmail. And probably many others that I don't know of. I even read that Windows was affected, although I don't know how that might be possible, since as far as I know they don't use tzdata. Anyway, not satisfied with how they mistakenly predicted the future before, a few weeks ago (not enough time in advance to fix almost any systems, only sid had this release), they added this change:

# From Alexander Krivenyshev (2008-09-05):
# As per message from Carlos Alberto Fonseca Arauz (Nicaragua),
# Argentina will start DST on Sunday October 19, 2008.
#
# http://www.worldtimezone.com/dst_news/dst_news_argentina03.html
# http://www.impulsobaires.com.ar/nota.php?id=57832 (in spanish)
Rule    Arg 2007    only    -   Dec 30  0:00    1:00    S
Rule    Arg 2008    max -   Mar Sun>=15 0:00    0   -
Rule    Arg 2008    max -   Oct Sun>=15 0:00    1:00    S

So, they decided to take the word of a guy from Nicaragua (no bad feelings against Nicaragua, but I think that this kind of stuff should be informed by people from the affected country), and from a couple of articles that say that "According to some sources, we might have to change our clocks on the third Sunday of October". Would you change tzdata sources with such information? I definitely wouldn't. Anyway, Aurelien Jarno has already uploaded fixed packages, with no assumption regarding when the DST will happen, which is the sensible thing to do in a case like this. Thanks Aurel!

New features usually come with new versions. Before reporting a bug for a new feature, it may be a good idea to make sure you are using the latest version. apt-get can be really useful for that.